论文部分内容阅读
《中国图书资料分类法》(第三版),据称是对第二版进行了“进一步充实、完善和提高”(第三版“修订说明”)。但是,根据我馆对“航空类”的使用和我们对其类目的分析研究,可以得出这样的结论:不改还好,非但没有把原来的问题改掉,反而改出了更多的新问题。至少说,第三版在“航空类”类目设置上是“漏洞百出”。下面分七个大的方面粗略谈谈其类目设置中存在的问题。一、重复设置类目。这类问题又可以分为三个方面来讲。1.同一关系类目误为不同的两个类目。由于“航空类”中有许多类目,不仅仅只有一个名称,而且还有
The Chinese Library and Information Classification (the third edition) is said to have been “further substantiated, refined and improved” in the second edition (Third Edition Revision Notes). However, based on our use of the “aviation class” and our analysis of its category, we can conclude that instead of changing the original one, instead of eliminating the original problem, more New question At the very least, the third edition is “full of loopholes” in the setting of “aviation” categories. Here are seven major aspects of the rough set about the problems in the category settings. First, repeat the set category. These problems can be divided into three aspects. 1. The same relationship category mistaken for two different categories. Because there are many categories in the “aviation category,” there is more than just a single name