论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志:“中国养蜂”1958年第7期所载“我国饲养蜜蜂的起源”一文,在最后一段中被加入了:“但张华的书,可能有一部分为后人所窜乱,不能完全作为根据,东晋郑缉之的永嘉地记比较可靠,不过此书早佚,所见者是后人的引文。”这几句话,我不能同意。我所引博物志两段的文字风格颇似魏晋间人的手笔,再可用郭璞赋作一个旁证,如果不是人家育养了蜂群,赋中所描写的是不能如此仔细的。因此,博物志的这两段文字是够得上张华的时代可以无疑的。即请你刊予以更正为要。
Editorial comrades: “China Beekeeping” contained in the seventh of 1958, “the origin of our country feeding bees,” a text, was added in the last paragraph: “But Zhang Hua’s book, there may be some for the posterity of chaos, can not Totally as a basis, the Eastern Jin Dynasty Zheng Ji’s Yongjia diary more reliable, but this book has long been lost, the see is a posterity quotations. ”These few words, I can not agree. I quoted two sections of the writing style of writing is quite similar to the Wei and Jin dynasties people’s handwriting, and then available to Guo Pu Fu as a circumstantial evidence, if not for others to nurture the bee colony, Fu described in can not be so carefully. Therefore, it is doubtless that these two passages of the biographies were enough to capture Zhang Hua’s era. That is, please give you a correction to be.