论文部分内容阅读
“公平”作为人类的追求目标,它千古悠悠,世代憧憬;而作为道德规范,则又深厚凝重,博大精深.公平的问题,可以说是一个古老而又常新的话题.一公平,历来是一个众说纷纭、各执一端的价值观念.哲学家从德或善的角度来论述公平,认为公平就是正义,就是与“某种标准相称”;法学家从秩序的角度来论述公平,主张公平就是“不偏不倚”,“不要破坏天平两端的平衡”;伦理学家从人格自由的角度来论述公平,强调公平就是“平等地分配基本的权利与义务”;而经济学家则更多地从分配的角度论述公平,有的认为公平就是“收入的均等化”,有的则主张公平就是“机会均等”、“投入与产
As an objective of mankind’s pursuit, “fairness” takes a long-term and long-term vision, while as a moral standard, it is profound, profound and profound, and fairness can be said to be an old and new topic. Different opinions and different values.Philosophers discuss fairness from the perspective of virtue or goodness, that fairness is justice, that is, “a standard is commensurate”; jurists from the perspective of order to discuss fairness, advocating fairness is “not biased Disregard ”and“ do not undermine the balance between the two ends of the scale. ”Ethicalists discuss fairness from the angle of personality freedom. Emphasis on fairness means“ equal distribution of basic rights and obligations. ”Economists, on the other hand, Some people think fairness means “equalization of income” while others advocate that fairness means “equal opportunity,” "investment and production