论文部分内容阅读
虚拟财产具有财产的价值性和可交易性,又不同于一般财产,具有特殊性。虚拟财产产生于网络游戏,近年来,虚拟财产纠纷逐渐增多。网络虚拟财产纠纷,特别是玩家与游戏运营商之间的纠纷为最为主要的虚拟财产纠纷。网络虚拟财产纠纷性质上属于服务合同违约纠纷。由于虚拟财产的特殊性,以及玩家和服务商收集证据能力的悬殊性,双方的举证责任不应参照通常的民事诉讼举证责任原则来分配,证明责任应该使用特殊的举证责任分配原则,玩家承担初步的证明责任,运营商承担主要但不是绝对的证明责任,并有相应的免责条款,来保证网络游戏环境秩序。
Virtual property has the value of property and tradable, but also different from the general property, with particularity. Virtual property is produced in online games. In recent years, the number of virtual property disputes has gradually increased. Network virtual property disputes, especially the dispute between players and game operators for the most important virtual property disputes. Network virtual property dispute nature of the service contract breach of contract disputes. Due to the particularity of virtual property and the disparity in the ability of players and service providers to collect evidence, the burden of proof on both sides should not be allocated according to the usual principle of burden of proof in civil litigation. The burden of proof should be based on the principle of special burden of proof, Of the burden of proof, the operator assumes the main but not the absolute burden of proof, and the corresponding exemption clauses, to ensure the orderly environment of online games.