论文部分内容阅读
美国诠释学家、文艺理论批评家赫施是伽达默尔的哲学诠释学重要的批评者之一。与伽达默尔把理解和解释的正确性闲置一旁,专注于阐明理解和解释如何发生的本体论诠释学取向的不同,赫施力图捍卫理解和解释的客观性立场,主张理解和解释是有限制的,其目标在于揭示和阐述文本的含义(以语言符号表达的作者意图),但他同时主张一种自由的批评,以沟通文本含义与其他事物之间的联系,并彰显文本的意义。在赫施对方法论诠释学的重构中,我们可以看到一种试图超越诠释学中的客观主义和主观主义、作者中心论和读者中心论二元对立的努力。
Hermes, an American hermeneutics and literary critic, is one of the important critics of Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. And Gadamer laid aside the correctness of understanding and interpretation and focused on elucidating the difference between the ontological hermeneutics of understanding and explaining how it took place. Hecht tried to defend the objective position of understanding and interpretation, arguing that there was a , The goal is to reveal and elaborate on the meaning of the text (the author’s intention expressed in linguistic signs), but at the same time he advocates a free criticism to communicate the connection between the meaning of the text and other things and to demonstrate the meaning of the text. In Hirsch’s reconstruction of methodological hermeneutics, we can see an attempt to transcend the dualism of objectivism and subjectivism, author-centered theory and reader-centered theory in hermeneutics.