论文部分内容阅读
背景关于健康相关的信息出现在低营养价值的产品的包装上,这一事件将会持续不断的争论下去。本研究旨在是通过验证与健康有关的包装信息和精加工即食谷物早餐(RTECs)的总体营养价值之间的关系而有助于进一步探讨。方法2010年德国使用最大变化抽样筛选128种精加工的RTECs。2012年,两份额外的样本在挪威(n=38)和德国(n=73)被采集,允许就各国使用不同规范营养素度量法的产品比较。所有产品依据五种营养素度量模型,在政府相关机构进行评估。Mann-Whitney U测试及卡方检验统计用来比较不同产品类别的营养素度量法。logistic回归分析旨在确定一个对德国产品包装信息估测令人信服的营养素度量法。结果大多数RTECs包装上显示与健康相关的营养信息,但只有4-36%的德国产品符合不同营养素度量法标准。面对儿童的谷物营销率较低,挪威的谷物营销较好(36-64%)。与健康相关的包装信息与营养素度量法并不一致。以下关于包装标准对2010年德国RTECs样品预估的一个满意的营养素度量法:ⅰ)谷物不销售给儿童,ⅱ)清理标签(无健康声称的)和尽可能使用有机和全谷物声称标注。结论本实验结果表明对与健康相关的包装信息产品强制实施营养素度量方案有助于RTECs健康有关包装信息和产品的总体营养评价之间关系的一致。改进方案还应考虑对产品的正面包装、标准化份量、准确的产品名称提供一个简单的营养标签计划,并明确界定全谷物声称。
Background The issue of health related information appearing on the packaging of low nutritional value products will continue to be debated. The aim of this study is to further explore the relationship between health-related packaging information and the overall nutritional value of processed ready-to-eat cereals (RTECs). Methods In 2010, 128 refined RTECs were screened by the largest sampling of changes in Germany. In 2012, two additional samples were collected in Norway (n = 38) and Germany (n = 73), allowing comparisons of products using different normative nutrient measures across countries. All products based on five nutrient metrics model, the government agencies to assess. The Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test statistics are used to compare nutrient measures across product categories. The logistic regression analysis is aimed at identifying a convincing nutrient measure of the German product packaging information. Results Most RTECs packages showed health-related nutritional information on packs, but only 4-36% of German products met different nutrient measures. The marketing of cereals to children is low, and the marketing of cereals in Norway is better (36-64%). Health-related packaging information is not consistent with nutrient metrics. Following a satisfactory nutrient measure of the packaging standard for the 2010 German RTECs sample estimate is: i) the sale of cereals to children, ii) the clearance of labels (without health claims), and the use of organic and whole grain claims whenever possible. Conclusions The results of this experiment show that the compulsory implementation of a nutrient measure on health-related packaging information products is consistent with the relationship between RTECs health-related packaging information and the overall nutritional evaluation of products. The improvement program should also consider providing a simple nutrition labeling plan for the front packaging of the product, a standardized weight, an accurate product name, and a clear definition of the whole grain claim.