论文部分内容阅读
本文从历史文献出发,研究了《礼部韵略》性质及其与《集韵》的关系。本文的研究结论是,宋初景德年间陈彭年修撰的《韵略》与景佑年间丁度刊修的《韵略》都走同一部韵书,丁度等人只是在旧韵基础上作了修订而已,其中最重要的是“窄韵十三处”同用及其韵次的改变。《集韵》是在原《韵略》的音系框架下修撰而成,虽然在编排体例的反切注音上与今传《礼部韵略》有许多共同之处,但内部差异仍然很大,如小韵的移并或混置,反切用字的修改,异读又音等,差异甚多,所以《礼部韵略》不是《集韵》未定稿的“简缩”本。《类篇》与《集韵》音切关系的一致性,可以反证《集韵》与《韵略》的内部差异。因此,我们现在所说的《礼部韵略》就是当年陈彭年编撰的《韵略》,与后来的各种增修互注本都是传承关系。由此可以说明景德《韵略》与《广韵》不是详略关系,与金人王文郁《新刊韵略》无涉。
Based on historical documents, this paper studies the nature of “Rituals” and its relationship with “Ji Yun”. The conclusion of this paper is that during the early Song Dynasty in Jingdezhen, Chen Yunian’s compilation of “Yunlue” and Jing Youzhong’s “Yunlue” all took the same rhyme book. Ding et al. Only revised the old rhyme based on the old rhyme. The most important is “Narrow rhyme thirteen Department ” with the same use and rhyme changes. The “Ji Yun” is the original “Yun Lue” under the framework of the phonetic system, although the arrangement of the anti-cut phonetic system and today’s biography, “Li Department rhyme” has many similarities, but the internal differences are still large, such as Small rhyme shift or mix, anti-cut with the word changes, different reading and so on, there are many differences, so “ritual rhyme” is not “rhyme” is not finalized “condensed” this. The consistency of the relations between the syllables and Jiyun can clear the internal differences between Ji Yun and Yun Yun. Therefore, what we now call “ritual rhyme” is the “rhyme” compiled by Chen Peng-nian and inherited the relationship with various later revisions. This shows that Jingde “Yunlue” and “Guangyun” is not a detailed relationship, and the Jinren Wang Wenyu “New Edition Yunlue” no.