论文部分内容阅读
1936年,卢卡契发表长文《叙述与描写——为讨论自然主义和形式主义而作》(以下简称《叙述与描写》或卢文),这是他讨论叙事形式政治性问题的标志性成果,也是西方马克思主义文论史上探讨这一问题的最早文献之一,因而具有特殊意义。马克思主义历史分析常被认为就是政治分析,但不少马克思主义学者的文学政治分析基本上是从作品内容角度展开,形式的政治性则一直是令他们棘手的课题。而不能克服形式的政治分析并不彻底,它为形式主义拒绝文学的政治性留
In 1936, Lukacs published his long article, “Narrative and Description - To Discuss Naturalism and Formalism” (hereinafter referred to as “Narrative and Description” or “Lo Wen”), which is a symbol of his discussion of the political issue of narrative form The achievements are also one of the earliest documents on this issue in the history of Western Marxist literary theory, and thus have special significance. The historical analysis of Marxism is often regarded as a political analysis. However, many Marxist scholars’ literary and political analyzes basically proceed from the perspective of the content of the work. The formal politics has always been their thorny topic. The political analysis that can not overcome the form is not complete. It is a political reservation that formalism rejects literature