循环:意义在解释中生成──切中·纠结·循环:现象学艺术本体论研究之四

• 作 者: 朱贻渊
• 机 构: 宁夏大学中文系!宁夏银川750021
• 出 处: 宁夏大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
• 发表日期: 1999年02期
• 关键词: 本体论研究 解释学 观照游戏 存在者 存在论 逻辑框架 历史意识 理解历史 存在过程 历史客观

假定现象学通过“本质的直观”对存在与思维同一性难题的解决是可行的，那么，同一的“此在”何以自明？ 同一的存在及其意义何以自明？ 在现代现象学的逻辑框架中，解释就成了惟一的出路，解释的循环就成了意义生成的基本原则。艺术作为存在与意义根源性形式，其本体的生成问题在这种理论基础上，就产生了第三个原则，即在循环中解释与对话的原则。但这一切都基于假定，实际上，它又留下了新的问题

It is feasible to assume that phenomenology solves the problem of the existence and the sameness of thinking through the “essential intuition”. So how can the same “this” be self-evident? The same existence and its significance Why self-evident? In the logical framework of modern phenomenology, interpretation becomes the only way out, and the cycle of interpretation becomes the basic principle of meaning generation. As a rooted form of existence and meaning, art forms the third principle on the basis of this theory, that is, the principle of interpretation and dialogue in the cycle. But all this is based on the assumption that, in fact, it leaves new problems behind again