论文部分内容阅读
9·11事件之后,人们不断谈论着各种各样的社会危险,各国政府也花费了大量人力物力,加强各方面的安全保卫工作,以防类似事件的发生。可惜的是,人们对社会危险的研究却很少。这也难怪,因为主流经济学家一般假设人是理性的,人们通过理性的互惠行动,使自己的福利最大化,同时也实现了整个社会的经济繁荣。在当前,了解一下公共选择学家、部分政治学家、经济学家和行政学家的相关研究,对于我们正确理解社会危险行为,还是很有启发意义的。
After the September 11 attacks, people kept talking about all kinds of social dangers. Governments also spent a lot of manpower and resources to step up security in all fields to prevent similar incidents. Unfortunately, there are few studies on the social dangers. It is no wonder that mainstream economists generally assume that people are rational and that people maximize their own welfare through rational reciprocal actions while realizing the economic prosperity of the entire society. At present, it is still very instructive to know about the relevant studies of public choice scientists, some political scientists, economists and administrators, so that we can correctly understand socially dangerous behaviors.