论文部分内容阅读
近些年来,在不同的社会背景之下,出于不同的目的,中学历史教育的改革问题受到华人社会的普遍重视,港、台、大陆的教育行政部门都先后颁布了新的高中历史课程标准,并在此指导下,编写了不同版本的高中历史教材。这些教材各具特色,互有优长,由于社会环境不尽相同,立场也不尽一致,因而对一些问题的看法,不同地区出版的教材自然也存在一些差异乃至歧异。笔者曾对台湾地区新课标历史教材的特点做过分析(见《中学历史教学》2005年第9期),在此试就香港特别行政区新的高中历史课程纲要颁布后编写的新教材的若干问题略作讨论,不妥之处,还请读者谅察并不吝赐教。
In recent years, under different social backgrounds and for different purposes, the reform of history education in secondary schools has been given the general prestige of Chinese society. The educational administration departments of Hong Kong, Taiwan and the Mainland have all promulgated new standards of history curriculum for senior high schools , And under the guidance of this, have compiled different editions of high school history textbooks. Because of their different social environments and their different positions, these textbooks have their own unique features and excellent interoperability. Therefore, there are some discrepancies and even divergences in views on some issues and textbooks published in different regions. I have conducted an analysis of the characteristics of the New Curriculum History Textbook in Taiwan (see “History Teaching in Secondary Schools”, No. 9, 2005). In this trial, a number of new textbooks written after the promulgation of a new high school history curriculum outline in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region A little discussion of the problem, inappropriate, but also ask readers to comment and educated us.