论文部分内容阅读
柏拉图在《斐多篇》中借用苏格拉底之口提出了灵魂不朽的观点,从哲学层面对灵魂进行了形而上学的思考。而现代科学主义者则对灵魂不朽这一观点进行了质疑和反驳。两者对灵魂的看法有着明显差异,但差异本身就是价值。灵魂是否能够不朽并不重要,重要的是作为人类应该看到灵魂存在对人本身所具有的价值和意义。
Plato borrowed the mouth of Socrates in “Fido” to propose the immortal point of view of the soul, and philosophically considered the soul from metaphysics. Modern scientists, on the other hand, have challenged and refuted the idea of the immortality of the soul. There is a clear difference between the two views of the soul, but the difference itself is the value. Whether or not the soul can be immortal does not matter, but what matters is that as humans, we should see the value and significance that the existence of the soul has for the human person.