论文部分内容阅读
国际体育运动的商业化和全球化致使实践中出现了大量的体育争议。国际体育仲裁被普遍认为是一种最为简捷而又高效的纠纷解决方式。基于中国的现实情况,在北京奥运会结束之后,国际体育仲裁理事会(ICAS)应当考虑将北京奥运会临时仲裁庭转换为常设仲裁分院,这不仅对中国体育法制改革与完善大有裨益,亦是国际地域平衡理念的彰显。从中国目前的仲裁实践与人才储备两个方面考察,中国已经具备设立国际体育仲裁院(CAS)北京常设分院的能力,但在司法上和立法上或许仍会遭遇许多法律障碍,这亟需理论上的澄清和对我国《体育法》、《仲裁法》等法律作出修改。
The commercialization and globalization of international sports have resulted in a large number of sports disputes in practice. International sports arbitration is generally considered as the most simple and efficient dispute resolution. Based on the reality of China, after the Beijing Olympic Games is over, the International Sports Arbitration Council (ICAS) should consider converting the interim arbitration tribunal of the Beijing Olympic Games into a permanent arbitration branch. This will not only be of great benefit to the reform and improvement of the sports law in China, but also to the international The concept of geographical balance highlights. Judging from China’s current arbitration practice and talent pool, China already has the capacity to set up the Beijing Branch of the International Sports Court of Arbitration (CAS), but many legal obstacles may still exist in the administration of justice and legislation. This urgently needs theory On the clarification of China’s “Sports Law”, “Arbitration Law” and other laws be amended.