论文部分内容阅读
目的研究高血压脑出血行神经内镜手术、微创穿刺术与开颅术的临床效果比较。方法 74例高血压脑出血患者,37例出血行神经内镜手术、微创穿刺术作为观察组,37例行开颅术作为对照组。治疗后对疗效进行分析。结果观察组在手术时间,出血量以及清除脑内瘀血的能力明显强于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论高血压脑出血行神经内镜手术、微创穿刺术与开颅术相比有着良好的效果,可以缩短患者的恢复期,治疗效果更加明显,手术时间更短,术中出血量更少,值得进行推广应用。
Objective To study the clinical effects of neuroendoscopic surgery, minimally invasive puncture and craniotomy in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods 74 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage and 37 patients with hemorrhage underwent neuroendoscopy, minimally invasive puncture as observation group and 37 underwent craniotomy as control group. Therapeutic effect analysis. Results The observation group had significantly stronger ability of removing blood stasis and bleeding during operation time than control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions Neuroendoscopic surgery and minimally invasive puncture in hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage have a good effect compared with craniotomy, which can shorten the recovery period of patients, the treatment effect is more obvious, the operation time is shorter, the amount of bleeding during operation is less, Worth to promote the application.