论文部分内容阅读
几年未见的好友海燕带着女儿小蒙蒙来我家小住,三岁的女儿王心怡和比她大两个月的小蒙蒙在一起,一会儿开心极了,一会儿又为争夺什么打起来,大家都不亦乐乎。报纸上登了一篇对三岁小孩进行毅力测试的文章,说的是,用同样的一个问题让几个孩子选择:“妈妈现在就给你一颗糖,或者我出去办点事,回来后给你两颗糖,你选哪个?”据说,多年后证明,回答要一颗糖的孩子无论在意志力和取得的学习和工作成绩等方面都不如回答要两颗糖的。遂想,正好可以对王心怡和小蒙蒙进行一下测试。我首先想到这个测试方法的弊端,因为孩子的回答肯定会受客观条件影响。比如在她吃够了糖和好几天没有碰过糖的情况下,对糖的渴望程度不一样,回答肯定也是不一样的,但我想也只好顺其自然了。
A few years ago, a friend, Haiyan, came to my house with her daughter Meng Meng, her three-year-old daughter Wang Xinyi and her small two-month-old Meng Meng together for a while very happy, while fighting for what fight again, everyone Exhilarating. The newspaper posted an article on perseverance testing for three-year-olds, saying that with the same question, let several children choose: “Mom now gives you a candy, or I go out and do something, come back Give you two sugar, which one do you choose? ”It is said that many years later it has been proved that children who answer for a candy are not as good as two grams of sugar in terms of their willpower, academic achievement and job performance. Suffice to, just to test the king Xinyi and small Meng Meng. I first think of the drawbacks of this test method, because the child’s answer will certainly be subject to objective conditions. For example, when she had enough sugar and did not touch sugar in a few days, the degree of desire for sugar was not the same. The answer was certainly not the same, but I thought I had to go with it.