论文部分内容阅读
在我国,长期以来疏于对公诉案件庭前准备程序的研究与制度构建,在实践中引发了一系列问题。此次刑事诉讼法增设了庭前会议程序,对于促进庭审程序的优质高效、实现诉讼公正意义重大。但该程序在我国的司法实践中尚处于起步阶段,具体的运行规则尚未精细化、明确化,需要司法人员在司法实践中不断完善。有必要进一步明确检察机关在庭前会议中角色定位及权利、义务,对庭前会议启动方式、审查对象、适用范围和效力等问题进行深入探讨,以期对公诉实务操作有所裨益。
In our country, for a long time, the neglect of the research and system construction of the pretrial preparation procedure of public prosecution cases has caused a series of problems in practice. The Criminal Procedure Law adds a pretrial procedure, which is of great significance to promoting the high quality and efficiency of the courtroom trial and realizing the justice of the lawsuit. However, the procedure is still in its infancy in the judicial practice of our country. The specific operating rules have not yet been refined and clarified. Judicial personnel need continuous improvement in judicial practice. It is necessary to further clarify the role of procuratorial organs in pre-court meetings and their rights and obligations, and to conduct in-depth discussions on the methods, objects of examination, scope of application and effectiveness of pre-trial meetings so as to provide some benefits to the practical operation of public prosecutions.