论文部分内容阅读
经济赔偿作为影响死刑执行类别的重要因素,在司法层面和理论层面都具有正当性。经济赔偿不同于以钱赎刑,与刑事和解具有本质区别。作为酌定量刑情节,应当将经济赔偿放置于整个量刑体系进行考量,只有当其确实能够直接影响被告人的已然之罪,并能够预防其再次犯罪时,才能够对量刑发挥作用。对被告人最终是否判处死刑,不以被害人方是否接受了经济赔偿为转移。对于具有极其严重社会危害性、被告人具有极其严重人身危险性的犯罪,即便被告人存在经济赔偿等从轻处罚情节,也不能一律不适用死刑。
Economic compensation, as an important factor influencing the execution of death penalty, is justified both in judicial and theoretical aspects. Economic compensation is different from the redemption by money, and criminal reconciliation is essentially different. As discretionary circumstances of sentencing, economic compensation should be placed in the entire sentencing system for consideration, and only if it can directly affect the accused’s already existing sin and prevent it from committing another crime can it contribute to sentencing. Whether the defendant is ultimately sentenced to death will not depend on whether the victim has accepted the financial compensation for the transfer. For those crimes that have extremely serious social dangers and the accused has extremely serious personal danger, the death penalty can not be invariably applied even if the accused has a lighter punishment such as financial compensation.