论文部分内容阅读
著名修辞学家陈望道先生曾说:“修辞学研究病例是它的一个重要方面”(《陈望道修辞论集》第280页)。近读著名修辞学史家郑子瑜教授的新著《唐宋八大家古文修辞偶疏举要》(教育科学出版社,1992年版),使我对望道先生的这一论点有了进一层的认识。郑先生以他的研究实践,证明了修辞病例的纠正是修辞学者责无旁贷的工作,而且是十分重要的工作。由于郑著是对中国文学史上地位至为显赫的唐宋八大家——韩愈、柳宗元、欧阳修、苏洵、苏轼、苏辙、王安石和曾巩古文中存在的修辞不当现象的修订,就使得它产生了非同一般的影响。它不仅打破了人们对名人名篇的迷信,而且为读者正确而全面地理解古文的本意提供了方便,为繁荣学术研究、弘扬祖国文化作出了积极的贡献。
Mr. Chen Wangdao, a famous rhetorician once said: “Rhetorical research cases are an important aspect of it” (“Chen Wangdao Rhetoric” p. 280). In the recent reading of Professor Zheng Ziyu, a famous historian of rhetoric, the new article, “Ancient and Nepalese Eight-character Rhetoric of Both Tang and Song Dynasties” (Educational Science Press, 1992) brought me to this point of view of Mr. Wang Dao. understanding. With his research and practice, Mr. Cheng proves that the correction of rhetorical cases is a duty-bound work of rhetoricians, and it is a very important task. Since Zheng Zheng is a revision of the rhetorical improper phenomena in Han and Yuan Liu, Ouyang Xiu, Su Xun, Su Shi, Su Zhe, Wang Anshi and Zeng Gong, which are most prominent in the history of Chinese literature, It has had a very different impact. It not only breaks the superstition of celebrities, but also provides convenience for readers to understand the original intention of ancient prose correctly and comprehensively, and makes a positive contribution to the prosperity of academic research and the development of the motherland’s culture.