对《说“勤”》分论点二的异议

• 作 者: 杨旭冠
• 出 处: 语文教学通讯
• 发表日期: 1998年06期
• 关键词: 初中语文 中心论点 摩斯 发音不准 高能物理研究 《浮士德》 限定范围 陈景润 创作思路 女青年

初中语文第四册《说“勤”》在开头提出中心论点“学业的精深造诣来源于勤”后，设立了两个分论点：“勤出成果”、“勤出智慧”。我认为后一分论点宜改成“勤能补拙”，理由是：１．根据第四段所选取的典型事例看，演说家德摩斯梯尼与陈正之均可谓“拙”矣。前者小时口吃...

After the fourth volume of the junior high school language, “Say Diligence,” put forward the central argument at the beginning, “The profound achievements of academics come from diligence,” they set up two points of argument: “Diligent results” and “Diligent wisdom.” I think that the latter argument should be changed to “reliable supplements.” The reasons are: 1. According to the typical case chosen in the fourth paragraph, both the speechers, Demosthenes and Chen Zhengzhi, can be described as “拙”. The former hours stutter...