论文部分内容阅读
目的探究经阴道三维能量多普勒超声与超声弹性成像技术对宫颈癌患者的诊断价值。方法选择2012年5月至2015年5月宫颈癌患者58例为研究对象,将其分成两组,对照组行经阴道三维能量多普勒超声检查,观察组行超声弹性成像技术进行检查,对比两组患者检查的特异度,准确度和灵敏度。结果弹性成像诊断准确度稍高于三维能量彩超,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三维能量彩超的敏感度高于弹性成像,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。弹性成像的特异度和三维能量彩超相比稍高,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但和既往研究结果相比,以上三项指标均存在统计学意义。结论从宫颈癌诊断的准确度,特异度和灵敏度来看,两种方式所提供的结果均较为公允,在临床上可对患者联合使用进行检查。
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of transvaginal three-dimensional energy Doppler ultrasound and ultrasound elastography for cervical cancer patients. Methods Fifty-eight patients with cervical cancer from May 2012 to May 2015 were divided into two groups. The control group was treated with vaginal three-dimensional energy Doppler ultrasonography and the observation group with ultrasound elastography. Group of patients examined the specificity, accuracy and sensitivity. Results The diagnostic accuracy of elastography was slightly higher than that of three-dimensional energy ultrasound, the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). The sensitivity of three-dimensional energy ultrasound is higher than that of elastic imaging, the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). The specificity of elastography is slightly higher than that of three-dimensional energy color Doppler ultrasound, the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). However, compared with the previous research results, the above three indicators have statistical significance. Conclusion From the accuracy, specificity and sensitivity of cervical cancer diagnosis, the results of the two methods are more fair, and the combination of patients can be clinically examined.