论文部分内容阅读
少数民族舞蹈的原始发生一般指向劳动生产学说,但劳动生产方式能不能决定少数民族舞蹈的地缘归宿却一直是学术界争议的话题。在此分别从少数民族农耕种植业、高原游牧业以及海洋渔业三大生产方式探讨少数民族秧歌、萬舞、灯舞的地缘归宿争议,指出通过地理标签来判断舞蹈的地缘关系是不够慎重的,建议在生态接触因素之外介入少数民族舞蹈发生的物种验证对象,并纠正了文化类比中的常见错误,揭示了三大生产方式对少数民族舞蹈发展框架的构建。
The primitive occurrence of minority dance generally points to the theory of labor production, but whether the mode of production of labor decides the geo-fate of minority dance has always been the subject of academic controversy. In this paper, we discuss the geo-fossil disputes of ethnic minority groups such as Yangko, Wanwu and Lampshades from the three major modes of farming, plateau nomadic and marine fisheries. They point out that it is not enough to judge the geo-relation of dance through geographical labeling. It is suggested to intervene the verification objects of ethnic minorities outside the ecological contact factors and to correct the common mistakes in cultural analogies and to reveal the construction of the framework of minority ethnic dance development by the three major modes of production.