论文部分内容阅读
在大陆史学风气转换中,近七十年来关于傅斯年及史语所史学的研究,经历了一个从革命语境回归学术语境的过程。1949年至“文革”时期,受制于阶级斗争思维,对傅斯年及史语所史学以政治批判为主。改革开放后教条化学风终结,开始以学术立场研究评价傅斯年及史语所史学,并蔚为学术史领域的热点。1949年后至1990年代的傅斯年及史语所史学研究,以主要作品的分析解读为主,焦点是对傅斯年史学思想的重新评判;21世纪以来,受当下学术思想史研究新趋向的影响,日益走向纵深和多元化,注重新材料的运用,出现新的关注角度,越来越聚焦于傅斯年及史语所与中国现代学术的建构问题。
In the transformation of mainland historiography, the study of the history of Fu Sinian and the history of the past 70 years has undergone a process of returning to the academic context from the revolutionary context. From 1949 to the “Cultural Revolution” period, subject to the thinking of class struggle, the history of Fu Sinian and the history of the main political criticism. After the reform and opening up, the dogma of chemical doctrine ended and began to evaluate Fu Sinian and the historiography of historiography from the academic standpoint, becoming a hot spot in the field of academic history. The study of the history of Fu Sinian and the history of the historians from 1949 to the 1990s was mainly based on the analysis and interpretation of the main works, with the focus on the re-evaluation of Fu Sinian’s historiography theory. Since the 21st century, influenced by the new trends in the study of the history of academic thought, To the depth and diversity, pay attention to the use of new materials, the emergence of new perspectives of concern, more and more focused on Fu Siannian and the history of modern Chinese academic construction.