论文部分内容阅读
德国民法上的责任是违反债的责任,是债法的组成部分。我国民法上的责任是违反民事义务的后果,责任超出了债的范畴。我国《物权法》规定的物权请求权是德国民法上责任理念的反映,造成我国民法体系矛盾。对此有三种不同的观点和思路,即多种侵权责任方式否定说、侵权责任与物权请求权竞合说、物权请求权变革为侵权责任请求权说。笔者主张后说。德国民法上的请求权附属和服务于“基础权利”体系,我国民法上的请求权附属和服务于“权利—义务—责任体系”。本文进一步阐述了将保护性绝对权请求权变革为侵权责任请求权的理论根据和立法方案。
German civil law liability is a breach of obligation, is an integral part of the law. The responsibility of civil law in China is a consequence of violating civil obligations, and the responsibility goes beyond the scope of debt. China's “Property Law” provides for the right to claim is the reflection of the concept of responsibility in German civil law, resulting in contradictions in our civil law system. There are three different views and ideas on this, that is, the denial of multiple tort liability states that the tort liability competes with the claims of real rights, and that the claims of real rights change into the claims of tort liability. After the author claims to say. The German civil law claims are attached to and serve the “basic rights” system, and the civil rights of China's civil law claims are attached to and serve the “rights-obligations-liability system.” This article further elaborates the theoretical basis and legislative proposal to transform the right of protection of absolute right into the right of claim of infringement.