论文部分内容阅读
在使用干部时,人们往往有这样一种思维定势:如果一个干部对下属要求严,处事大刀阔斧,即使工作方法粗一点,也认为是个好干部,容易被提拔和使用。反之,就认为“没魄力”,即使工作表现不错,和下属相处融洽也往往不被人赏识,不能委以重任。久而久之,管理上的宽松和严格成了评判干部优劣的一个标准,事实真是这样吗? 一、不能简单地肯定或否定“宽”和“严” 每个领导干部都有不同的处事态度和处事方法,这主要取决于他的事业
When using cadres, people tend to have such a tendency of thinking. If a cadre has strict demands on his subordinates and resolute things, he thinks that he is a good cadre who can be promoted and used even if the working methods are crude. On the contrary, they think that “no courage”, even if the performance is good, get along well with subordinates are often not appreciated, can not be entrusted with the task. In the course of time, the leniency of management has become a criterion for judging the merits of cadres. Is this really the case? First, we can not simply affirm or negate the “broadness” and “strictness.” Each leading cadre has different attitudes and behaviors Method, it depends mainly on his career