论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨剖宫产腹壁横切口两种缝合方法的优缺点,观察两种方法对切口愈合的影响,改进剖宫产切口的缝合技术。方法:对460例腹壁横切口剖宫产患者依据切口缝合方式分为两组,两组均用利康线三针间断缝合皮下脂肪组织,观察组235例,皮肤用组织钳钳夹对合,医用无菌纸胶布粘贴伤口。对照组225例用4-0快薇乔可吸收线皮内缝合。结果:采用单纯脂肪层3针缝合方法缝合切口具有缝合时间短、伤口愈合佳、经济、无需拆线、瘢痕较小、皮下无硬结的优点。结论:新式剖宫产术腹部切口单纯脂肪缝合方法效果较好,值得推广。
Objective: To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of two suture methods of transverse incision in cesarean section, observe the effect of the two methods on incision healing and improve the suture technique of cesarean section incision. Methods: 460 cases of abdominal cesarean section with transverse incision were divided into two groups according to the method of incision suture. The two groups were interrupted sutured subcutaneous adipose tissue with the third needle of Likang line. The observation group was 235 cases. Sterile paper tape affixed to the wound. 225 cases of control group with 4-0 quick Joe joe absorbable intradermal suture. Results: The simple fat layer 3-suture method of suture incision with short suture, good wound healing, economical, without stitches, small scars, no subcutaneous induration advantages. Conclusion: The new cesarean section abdominal incision simple fat suture method is better, it is worth promoting.