论文部分内容阅读
社论作为代表报社意见的评论,在报刊中占有核心地位,具有相当重要的历史研究价值。本文选取《中央日报》、《大公报》和《解放》周刊三个较有代表性的刊物,以它们在卢沟桥事件后所发的社论为研究对象,结合具体历史背景,以文本分析的方法,探究三份报刊的社论在面对卢沟桥事件及其所带来的危局时,做出的具体评论,分析它们的异同,并简要地探讨造成这些异同的原因。
As an opinion commentary on behalf of the newspaper, editorials occupy a central position in newspapers and periodicals and have a very important historical research value. This paper chooses three more representative journals from the Central Daily, Ta Kung Pao and Jiefang Weekly. Taking the editorials they made after the Lugou Bridge incident as the research object, combining with the specific historical background and textual analysis, The editorials of the three newspapers made specific comments in the face of the Lugouqiao incident and the crisis it caused, analyzed their similarities and differences, and briefly discussed the reasons for these differences.