论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨为初产妇提供无保护会阴接生法的效果。方法以2014年1月至2016年5月为期,共挑选初产妇132例。为其中66例产妇采用传统保护会阴接生法,数据记对比组;另外66例则采用无保护会阴接生法,数据及研究组。结果研究组产妇分娩时会阴侧切率为25.76%(17/66),明显低于对比组46.97%(31/66),两组数据存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论初产妇分娩时利用无保护会阴接生法更加有效,可降低会阴侧切几率。
Objective To explore the effect of providing unprotected perineal birth to primipara. Methods From January 2014 to May 2016, 132 cases of primipara were selected. Among them, 66 maternal women adopted the traditional method of protecting the perineal birth and the data comparison group; the other 66 cases used the unprotected perineal birth and the data and study group. Results The rate of episiotomy in the study group was 25.76% (17/66), which was significantly lower than that in the control group (46.97%, 31/66). There was statistical significance between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusions The use of unprotected perineal birth in early labor during childbirth is more effective and may reduce the risk of episiotomy.