论文部分内容阅读
环境规制是一个已经讨论了很长时间的问题,其主要规制手段——行政手段和市场手段早已为人们所熟知。近年来,相对于坚持两种规制手段均为主的美、日、德等环境规制效果较好的国家,我国越来越倾重于以市场手段为主来进行环境规制,但规制效果相对以上国家却仍然存在较大差距。找到环境规制效果差别巨大的原因对于构建和谐社会,促进人与自然协调发展具有极为重要的关键性作用。以法经济学作为切入点来考察坚持两种环境规制手段均为主的原因以及这样做的意义和影响,从而指出我国环境规制政策中的不足和效果不佳的原因,并为我国进一步完善环境规制政策和改善环境规制效果提出意见建议。
Environmental regulation is a matter that has been discussed for a long time. The main regulatory measures - administrative measures and market instruments have long been known. In recent years, relative to the countries that adhere to the principle that the two forms of regulation are the mainstay of the environmental regulation, such as the United States, Japan and Germany, our country is increasingly focusing on market regulation as the main mode of environmental regulation. However, There is still a big gap between countries. Finding the reason for the huge difference in the effects of environmental regulation plays an extremely crucial role in building a harmonious society and promoting the coordinated development of man and nature. To use legal economics as the starting point to investigate the reasons for insisting on two kinds of environmental regulation means are the main reasons and the significance and impact of doing so, pointing out the inadequacy and ineffectiveness of China’s environmental regulation policy, and for our country to further improve the environment Regulate policies and improve the effectiveness of environmental regulation put forward suggestions and suggestions.