论文部分内容阅读
公权私化是一个行政应用伦理的前沿问题。公权私化的本质是对公共权力的盗窃和掠夺。公务员的权利实质上都是公共权力,公权私化造成的恶果是权力公共性质的破缺,公权私化追求的是一己私利的最大化。古代思想家、资产阶级思想家、马克思主义经典作家都曾对公权私化进行过批判。在市场经济条件下,破除“公权私化”的主要策略是清除“公权私化有理”论的影响,把相关道德上升为法律,变无形约束为有形约束,变软约束为硬约束,变晚约束为早约束。
The privatization of public rights is a frontier issue of administrative application ethics. The essence of public service privatization is theft and plunder of public power. The civil servants’ rights are essentially public power. The evil consequences of the privatization of public rights are the breaking of the public nature of power. The pursuit of private rights of public servants is the maximization of self-interest. Ancient thinkers, bourgeois thinkers and classic Marxist writers once criticized the privatization of public order. Under the condition of market economy, the main strategy of breaking the “private ownership of public services” is to remove the influence of “public right, personal and rational” theory, to raise the relevant morality to law, to change the intangible constraint into a tangible constraint and a soft constraint For hard constraints, late constraints for the early constraints.