老年慢性肾脏病患者生活质量评估及其危险因素分析

来源 :中华肾脏病杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:longyilang
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:了解65岁以上慢性肾脏病(chronic kidney disease,CKD)患者的老年综合评估评分情况,并分析患者生活质量的相关影响因素。方法:本研究为回顾性队列研究,入选2016年10月至2019年10月在山西省人民医院肾内科诊断为CKD且65岁以上的189例患者,依据患者是否透析分为透析组(n n=90例)和非透析组(n n=99例)。简明老年综合评估评分包括年龄、基本日常生活活动(basic activities of daily living,BADL)能力评估、工具性日常生活活动(instrumental activities of daily living,IADL)能力评估以及改良老年疾病累计评分表(modified cumulative illness rating score for geriatrics,MCIRS-G),收集患者的临床资料。采用Pearson相关分析分析不同量表评分与各个临床指标之间的相关关系,进一步使用多元线性回归分析老年CKD患者生活质量的相关影响因素。n 结果:与非透析组相比,透析组患者的BADL评分及IADL评分均显著降低[(70.00±33.28)分比(93.38±14.32)分,n t=6.166,n P<0.001;(9.78±7.12)分比(15.95±5.74)分,n t=6.520,n P<0.001],而MCIRS-G评分显著升高[(31.13±4.00)分比(27.29±5.17)分,n t=-5.741,n P<0.001]。对非透析组患者数据行线性回归分析,结果显示,与BADL评分呈正相关的因素为估算肾小球滤过率(estimated glomerular filtration rate,eGFR)、血尿酸、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(low-density lipoprotein cholesterol,LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(high-density lipoprotein cholesterol,HDL-C)、血钾和血氯(均n P<0.05),呈负相关的因素为B型钠尿肽(n P<0.01);与IADL评分呈正相关的因素为eGFR、血尿酸、HDL-C、LDL-C、血钾和血氯(均n P<0.05),呈负相关的因素为年龄和B型钠尿肽(均n P<0.05)。无论是否包含肾脏评分,空腹血糖均与MCIRS-G评分呈正相关,eGFR、血尿酸、总胆固醇和HDL-C与MCIRS-G评分呈负相关(均n P<0.05)。多元线性回归结果显示,BADL的独立影响因素为eGFR(n P<0.01),IADL评分的独立影响因素为年龄和eGFR(均n P<0.05)。n 结论:老年CKD患者生活质量降低与eGFR、血尿酸、年龄、B型钠尿肽及HDL-C水平有关,其中eGFR和年龄为老年生活质量的独立影响因素。“,”Objective:To understand the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) scores in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients aged 65 years and older, and analyze the related influencing factors of quality of life.Methods:A total of 189 patients who were over 65 years old and diagnosed with CKD in the Department of Nephrology of Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital from October 2016 to October 2019 were included retrospectively. The patients were divided into dialysis group (n n=90 cases) and non-dialysis group (n n=99 cases) according to whether dialysis or not. The concise CGA scores included age, basic activities of daily living (BADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and modified cumulative illness rating score for geriatrics (MCIRS-G). Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between different scale scores and clinical indexes. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to further analyze independent related factors of the quality of life in elderly CKD patients.n Results:Compared with the non-dialysis group, the BADL score and IADL score in the dialysis group were significantly reduced [(70.00±33.28) vs (93.38±14.32), n t=6.166, n P<0.001; (9.78±7.12) vs (15.95±5.74),n t=6.520, n P<0.001], while the MCIRS-G score was significantly increased [(31.13±4.00) vs (27.29±5.17),n t=-5.741, n P<0.001]. Linear regression analysis performed on the data of non-dialysis group patients showed that estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum uric acid (SUA), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), blood potassium and chlorine were positively correlated with BADL and IADL scores (alln P<0.05). B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) was negatively correlated with BADL score (n P<0.01). BNP and age were negatively correlated with IADL score (bothn P<0.05). Fasting blood glucose (FBG) was positively correlated with MCIRS-G or MCIRS-G other than kidney (bothn P<0.05), and eGFR, SUA, total cholesterol, and HDL-C were negatively correlated with MCIRS-G or MCIRS-G other than kidney (alln P<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that eGFR was an independent influencing factor for BADL (n P<0.01). Age and eGFR were independent influencing factors for IADL (bothn P<0.05).n Conclusions:The decline of quality of life in elderly CKD patients is related with eGFR, SUA, age, BNP and HDL-C levels, and eGFR and age are independent influencing factors.
其他文献
会议
会议
会议
1.劳动保障部杜保中心孟昭喜主任做总结讲话2.劳动保障部社保中心张寿琪副主任讲话3.劳动保障部社保中心戴广义副主任讲话4.劳动保障部杜保中心皮德海副主任讲话5.与会者认真
目的:观察不同透析龄的腹膜透析(peritoneal dialysis,PD)患者腹膜组织中腹膜间皮细胞(human peritoneal mesothelial cells,HPMCs)及血管内皮细胞表达钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白(Nan
会议
2003年,别墅在北京着实火了一把,而现在,几乎所有的人都相信2004年别墅市场将会更加的火暴。2004年京城别墅市场有什么新的政策,有什么新的动向,有什么新的概念,又有什么新
会议