论文部分内容阅读
我国民事诉讼非法证据排除规则,两个“非法”标准均集中于对“行为”法律评价,过于狭窄,且不符合我国现有的证据收集制度和司法实践,应当引入一定的行为外实体评价因素,限定“非法”范围,减少证据排除数量,在强调程序的同时,避免对实体造成大的冲击。同时,应当在非法证据的认定及是否排除方面,通过给予法官以自由裁量权等途径进一步完善相关规则。
The rules for the exclusion of illegal evidence in civil litigation in China and the two “unlawful” standards all focus on the “behavioral” legal evaluation. They are too narrow and do not conform to the existing system of evidence collection and judicial practice in our country. We should introduce certain behaviors The evaluation of external entities limits the scope of “illegal ”, reduces the number of evidence to be excluded, and emphasizes the procedure, while avoiding a major impact on the entity. At the same time, we should further improve the rules by giving judges discretionary power and other means in determining and excluding illegal evidence.