论文部分内容阅读
自从江泽民同志在建党80周年讲话中提出“我们应该结合新的实际,深化对社会主义社会劳动和劳动价值理论的研究和认识”以来,国内理论界围绕着劳动和劳动价值问题展开了激烈的讨论。这无疑有助于学术理论的进步和发展,但是整场讨论也给人以无序和混乱之感。争论各方,无论是坚持、肯定还是排斥、否定马克思的劳动价值论,首先应当明确一点:马克思的劳动价值论是一个建立在严格定义基础上的理论,对其中任一概念的偷换或混用都将导致对整个理论的曲解。本文试图对劳动价值论中最核心的价值范畴进行全面的分析和解读,并就争论中混用的各种价值概念一一进行比较和辨别,以期望能够促进讨论走向有序。
Since Comrade Jiang Zemin put forward “We should combine the new reality with deepening the research and understanding of the theory of labor and labor value in socialist society” in his speech on the 80th anniversary of the founding of the CPC, there has been a heated discussion in the domestic theoretical circles about the issue of labor and labor value . This undoubtedly contributes to the progress and development of academic theory, but the entire discussion also gives a sense of disorder and chaos. All parties to the debate, no matter insisting, affirming or excluding, denied Marx’s labor theory of value, we should first of all make it clear that Marx’s theory of labor value is a theory based on a strict definition and that any one of them should be replaced or mixed All will lead to misinterpretation of the whole theory. This article attempts to conduct a comprehensive analysis and interpretation of the core value categories in labor theory of value and compare and discern the various concepts of value mixed in the debate one by one in the hope that discussions can be promoted in an orderly manner.