论文部分内容阅读
国家队在亚洲杯赛尝试了全攻全守的打法,结果一败涂地。一时之间,专家、球迷议论纷纷。一种说法认为长期以来的“防反”让中国队风格僵化,战术单调,对手了如指掌而易于防范,早已走入死路,现在尝试全攻全守,虽不成功,但方向值得肯定,应该成为中国队在世界杯预赛中的主要打法。另一种观点认为“防反”乃是由中国队目前的实力和队员特点所决定的,改之不易,亚洲杯赛的惨败已证明尝试已经完全失败,全攻全守对中国队而言乃“巧妇做无米之炊”。在冲击世界杯的征途上,中国队只有采用“防反”老套路,力争发挥自身特点,才有成功的希望。两种观点水火不容,大相径庭。 打法的争论,在中国足坛由来已久,反反复复,并为此付出了相当的代价。苏永舜曾经带出了中国足坛迄今为止最有风格、最有特点的一支球队,但他最后还是被另一支更有特点
National team in the Asian Cup try all attack and defending the style of play, the result failed. Suddenly, experts, fans talked about. A saying that the long-term “anti-anti” let the Chinese team style rigid, monotonous tactics, opponents well known and easy to guard, has long been into the dead end, and now try to attack and defend the whole, although not successful, but the direction worthy of recognition, should become China Team in the World Cup preliminaries in the main play. Another view that the “anti-anti” is determined by the Chinese team’s current strength and characteristics of the players, the change is not easy, the Asian Cup fiasco has proved the attempt has been completely failed, the whole attack and defend the Chinese team is “Clever woman to do without straw.” In the impact of the World Cup journey, the Chinese team only use “anti-anti” old routine, and strive to play their own characteristics, have the hope of success. Two ideas are mixed, very different. Playing the controversy in China has a long history of football, repeatedly, and to pay a considerable price. Su Yong Shun once brought out the Chinese football so far the most style, the most characteristic of a team, but he finally was another more features