论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志:我经常看到一些年轻教师聚集在一起谈论公开课。大家认为公开课不外乎两种目的:一、有经验教师的示范课,提供一个榜样,供大家学习;二、为求改革的研究课,供大家探讨、摸索,从而总结经验,相互取长补短。不管为达什么目的,大家有一个共同的愿望:公开课起码要真实。目前,教改的形势逼人,语文教学更是势在必改。一些学校已走出了教改的路子,总结出可贵的经验;一些学校也正在探讨和摸索。公开课的试行,有力的推动着教学改革。然而,有的公开课竟然弄虚作假。课前导演,几经排练,什么地方提问,哪一个问题由谁答,如何答,统统巧作安排,配好角色,师生真正是“胸有成竹进课堂”。
Editorial comrades: I often see some young teachers gathered to talk open class. We think open class is nothing more than two purposes: First, experienced teachers demonstration class to provide an example for everyone to learn; Second, for the reform of the course, for everyone to explore, explore, to sum up experience, learn from each other. No matter for what purpose, we all have a common wish: the open class should be at least truthful. At present, the situation of teaching reform is pressing, and language teaching is even more necessary. Some schools have stepped out of the education reform path and come up with valuable experience; some schools are also exploring and exploring. Trial of open class, a strong impetus to teaching reform. However, some open classes actually make mistakes. Before the class director, after rehearsing, where to ask questions, who answers the question, how to answer, all cleverly arranged, with a good role, teachers and students really are “well-formed into the classroom.”