论文部分内容阅读
《会计先审,领导后批》好不好的几封读者来信发表以后,引起了广大基层工作者的深切关注,短短两个月,我们又收到上百封来稿、来信。我们粗略统计了一下,认为采用这项建议好的约占50%.认为这个办法不宜提倡的约占30%,其余另有见解。由于这个问题牵涉面广,比较复杂,不是简单规定一下就可以解决的。将来国家颁布会计法以后,各部门、各单位可以按照会计法要求,结合本部门、本单位的情况.对审批程序作些具体补充规定。本期我们再选登高信一同志的这篇文章。因限于篇幅,其他有关这个问题的来信、来稿就不一一刊登了。
After the publication of a few letters from readers, it aroused the deep concerns of the broad masses of grassroots workers. In just two months, we received over 100 letters and letters. We have a rough statistics and consider that about 50% of the proposals are good, and about 30% should not advocate this solution. Due to the wide range of issues involved, it is rather complicated and can not be solved simply by stipulating it. After the promulgation of the accounting law in the future, various departments and units may, in accordance with the requirements of the accounting law, combine the conditions of their own departments and their own units with some specific supplementary provisions on the examination and approval procedures. In this installment, we will select this article of Comrade Gao Xinzhi. Due to space limitations, other letters on this issue, contributions are not published one by one.