论文部分内容阅读
在当前社会,每提及公正的司法审判和传媒报道,大多数人会认为这是一对矛盾体。每当两者相遇,便会出现法律问题。媒体自由报道与司法公正是民主法治社会珍视的两种价值,二者在所追求的目标上具有一致性,而传媒活动与司法活动的本质特征又决定了二者具有天然的冲突性。这种冲突通常是由两种表面上相互矛盾的权利造成的。在整个世界传播法律与伦理下,皆是如此。本文将细述司法审判与传媒报道的关系,剖析两者间的冲突和契合,谋求公正审判与法庭报道的平衡。
In the present society, most people consider it a contradictory body whenever it refers to impartial judicial trial and media coverage. Whenever the two meet, there will be legal issues. The freedom of media coverage and judicial fairness are two values that the society under the rule of democracy and rule of law cherish. Both of them are consistent in the pursuit of the goal, and the nature of the media activity and the judicial activity determines the natural conflict between the two. This conflict is usually caused by two seemingly contradictory rights. This is true of the communication of law and ethics throughout the world. This article will elaborate on the relationship between judicial trial and media coverage, analyze the conflicts and the fit between them, and seek a balance between fair trial and court reporting.