论文部分内容阅读
一项刊自于近期出版的《内科医学年鉴》杂志上的研究结果显示,研究人员通过对侵入性治疗或置入支架的血管成形术治疗肾动脉狭窄的相关文献的系统分析结果提示两种治疗方法均可获得相似的肾功能预后,但对于患有两种疾病的病人来说,行血管成形术治疗后的患者血压较易控制,不过该研究结果还有待进一步验证。此项研究负责人、Tufts新英格兰医学研究中心的Ethan Balk博士在接受Medscape记者采访时强调指出,这一研究发现并不令人惊讶,因为他们用以直接对比分析的药物疗法和支架血管成形术治疗肾动脉狭窄的文献极为有限,亦没有充分的证据可以支持哪种疗法更适合。 Balk博士对此解释说,肾动脉粥样硬化及狭窄在老年人群中日渐增多,其中30%患者还同时伴有
A recent study published in the Journal of Internal Medicine showed that the results of a systematic analysis of the literature on the treatment of renal artery stenosis by invasive or stenting angioplasty suggest that both treatments Both methods have similar prognosis of renal function, but for patients with both diseases, blood pressure is easier to control in patients after angioplasty, but the results of this study need further validation. The study lead, Dr. Ethan Balk, Tufts New England Medical Research Center, told Medscape in an interview that the study was not surprising because they were used for direct comparative analysis of pharmacotherapy and stent angioplasty The literature for treating renal artery stenosis is extremely limited and there is insufficient evidence to support which treatment is more appropriate. Dr. Balk explained that renal atherosclerosis and stenosis are increasing in the elderly, of which 30% are accompanied by