论文部分内容阅读
民法总则专家建议稿确立的民商合一体例源于这些年合一理念的深入人心,但这一相对式的民商合一并不能解决“商特殊需求”的问题,这不仅体现在原则方面,也表现在具体的规则设计上。对于需要商法特殊调整的内容,不能通过但书的方式在民法典中规定,因为其与民法之间是彼此独立的平行关系。基于民商二法既有重叠又各自存在特别调整范围的实际情况,对于商事立法的选择,采用重叠部分适用民法规定,特殊部分单独列出形成一部商事通则实为最佳选择。
The principle of civil-commercial integration established by the experts’ proposal of civil law stems from the consensus of these years, but this relative civil-commercial integration can not solve the problem of “business-specific needs” not only in Principles, but also in the design of specific rules. For the need of special adjustment of commercial law content, can not pass the proviso of the civil code provisions, because it is independent of each other and civil law parallel relationship. Based on the fact that both civil and commercial laws have overlapping and special scope for adjustment, the selection of commercial legislation adopts the overlapping part of civil law provisions and the special part alone lists the formation of a commercial guideline as the best choice.