论文部分内容阅读
文苑百花齐放,争鸣之声嗷嗷,这生动活泼的局面是人们期待已久的。然而,有创作就有批评,因为,批评是为了文艺,只有“真切的批评,才有真的新文艺和新批评的产生的希望”。近来,人们对某些电影、小说等在进行争鸣、评论中,既不抚毛搔痒,又不苗地驰马,态度之正,用语之诚,其意之善,都是可嘉的;这些评论,大灭了“三子”之气(棍子、帽子、辫子),令人心悦意畅。但是,在文艺作品评论中,特别是对电影的评论,有一点却有提请注意之必要:凡作品的情节或细节,都必须“真实”,要“经得起推敲”。似乎“真实”和“经得起推敲”成了文艺作品特别是电影艺术的唯一标准。我以为这样的标准的
Wenyuan flowers bloom, the vociferous contests, this lively situation is long-awaited. However, there is criticism of creation, because criticism is for literature and art, and only “real criticism leads to genuine new art and hope for the emergence of new criticism.” Recently, people are not scrutinizing or commenting on certain films or novels, nor are they exaggerating. Their attitudes are positive, their language is sincere and their meaning is good. These are the Comments, out of the “three” gas (sticks, hats, braids), it is pleasant and smooth. However, in the commentary of literary and artistic works, especially the commentary on films, there is one thing that has to be brought to the attention of the need: Every plot or detail of a work must be “real” and “standstill”. Seems “true” and “standstill” has become the only standard of literary works, especially the art of cinema. I think this standard