论文部分内容阅读
高考诗歌阅读试题对学生们来说,一直是一个难啃的骨头。花费时间不少,但收效甚微。在诗歌情感内容方面,有的同学只会作一些贴标签式的回答,只能说悲伤或者喜悦之类的笼统性概念,并不能行之有效、细致入微地诠释作品的内涵。在艺术手法方面,只能机械地罗列术语,以求自己的答案能与标准答案产生最大程度的“共鸣”。这就暴露了在诗歌鉴赏教学和备考方面缺少针对性的指导,似乎只能就题论题,并不能举一反三、触类旁通。既然备考都没有归纳总结的意识,那么诗歌品鉴能力就不
College entrance exam poetry reading questions for students, has always been a bite to eat the bones. Spent a lot of time, but with little effect. In the emotional content of poetry, some students only make some tag-type answers, can only say general concepts like sadness or joy, and can not explain the connotation of the work effectively and nuancedly. In terms of artistic practices, only terms can be mechanically listed so that their answers produce the greatest degree of “resonance” with standard answers. This exposes the absence of targeted guidance in the teaching of poetry appreciation and preparation. It seems that only the topic of discussion can not be summed up. Since the pro forma did not summarize the sense of induction, then poetry tasting ability is not