论文部分内容阅读
本文从路径依赖、营销难度、政策倾向和改革方式这四个导致20世纪80年代集体林权改革未获成功的原因进行了分析;对集体林权改革得以推广的条件、新一轮集体林权改革的绩效以及林改研究中若干观点进行了的评价;从林权改革的含义:还权与赋权、林权的性质:完整林权与不完整林权和森林经营管理的主体:农户本位与社区本位三个方面,对国内外林权改革的异同进行了比较分析;最后,提出了改革育林基金制度、改革采伐制度和改革森林生态补偿制度的基本思路,以及把森林生态补偿制度拓展为森林培育补助制度,使之与造林补助制度一起形成我国完整的林业补助政策的政策建议。
This article analyzes the reasons why the reforms of collective forest rights in the 1980s were unsuccessful, including the path dependence, the difficulty of marketing, the tendency of policies and the ways of reform. The reasons for the promotion of collective forest tenure reform, the new round of collective forest tenure The performance of reform and the evaluation of several opinions in the study of forest reform; From the meaning of forest tenure reform: the right and power of forest reform, the nature of forest tenure: the main body of complete forest tenure and incomplete tenure and forest management and management: peasant household standard And community-based three aspects, a comparative analysis of the similarities and differences between the reform of forest tenure at home and abroad; Finally, proposed the basic idea of reforming the system of forestation fund, reforming the harvesting system and reforming the system of forest ecological compensation, and expanding the forest ecological compensation system into The forest cultivation subsidy system, together with the afforestation subsidy system, forms the policy suggestion of our country’s complete forestry subsidy policy.