论文部分内容阅读
一、集体财产的产权问题笔者在考察了深圳市股份合作经济的运行机制后认为,深圳市的股份合作经济无论在理论上还是在实践中都没有建立起一套明晰的产权制度,集体财产产权依然“虚置”,产权所有者不清.按照深圳市政府的有关规定,深圳市股份合作企业的股本由三部分构成:集体积累股、个人分配股和个人集资股.“集体积累股”是指原村或合作社集体资产折股形成的股份;“个人分配股”又称“合作股”,指村或合作社集休资产折股后划定给个人用于分配的股份;“个人集资股”指村或合作社在年终应分未分给个人的资金投入购建资产和公司生产经营发展而向个人筹集的现金股份.其中,按规定,前二者的股权属“集体”所有.这样就产生一个问题,即随着深圳市逐步城市化过程中行政村的消亡和股份公司的成立,“集体”这个概念到底指谁?谁代表集体来行使权力?若说“集体”是股份合作企业,不妥.因为从法律上讲,任何财产、权益都有
First, the property rights of collective property After studying the operating mechanism of the Shenzhen Stock Cooperative Economy, the author believes that the stock cooperative economy in Shenzhen has not established a set of clear property rights system in theory or in practice, and collective property ownership Still “virtual” ownership unclear.According to the relevant provisions of the Shenzhen Municipal Government, the Shenzhen Stock Cooperative’s share capital consists of three parts: the collective accumulation of shares, individual distribution shares and individual fund-raising shares. Refers to the original village or cooperative collective equity assets formed by the shares; “individual distribution shares,” also known as “cooperative shares” refers to the village or cooperative retirement assets set aside for personal distribution of shares; “individual fund-raising” means Village or co-operative at the year-end should be divided into individual funds invested in the purchase and construction of assets and the company’s production and management development to individuals raised cash shares which, according to the provisions of the former two equity is “collective.” This will produce a The question is, with the demise of administrative villages and the establishment of joint-stock companies in the process of gradual urbanization in Shenzhen, who is the concept of “collective” So that power? If we say “collective” is a joint-stock cooperative enterprises, is wrong, because legally speaking, any property, rights and interests have