论文部分内容阅读
自法院2002年开始受理商标确权案件起迄今已逾十年。在此期间的案件审理中,法院与商标评审委员会(简称“商评委”)虽然在许多问题上意见一致,但随着商标案件类型的不断复杂化以及商标法相关理论研究的进展,法院和商评委在一些问题的处理上仍存在分歧,以往的一些做法也有一些调整和改变。笔者曾于2009年撰文就商标行政案件中的相关问题进行过总结,本文仅就2009年以来商标行政案件中的一些新情形及新做法进行梳理。当然,本文所述并非均已成为法院的一致做法,但其至少代表着司法实践中的一种观点,值得关注。
Since the court began accepting trademark rights cases in 2002, it has been more than 10 years. During the trial of the case during this period, although the courts and Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (“TRAB”) agreed on many issues, with the continuous complication of the types of trademark cases and the progress made in the research on the related theories of trademark law, There are still differences on the handling of some issues with the TRAB, and some adjustments and changes have been made to some of the previous practices. In 2009, the author summarized the related issues in the trademark administrative cases. This article only reviews some new cases and new practices in trademark administrative cases since 2009. Of course, not all of the approaches described in this article have become the unanimous practice of the courts, but they at least represent one view in judicial practice that deserves our attention.