论文部分内容阅读
因为工作的关系,平日里读中学历史教师的文章多些,被问及“怎样写论文”一类的问题也自然多些。说实话,我不谙写作,倒是看人家的东西还有些心得,这里不妨说说,不一定正确。就说三种常见病吧。一是常常失之于对所持概念的模糊的,甚至是错误的理解,使得文章从立论伊始就站不住脚。一些论文不管是对自己所欲阐述的概念,还是对别人已经解释的概念,一概不求甚解,知之颇少,理解很偏,乃至发生错误性的认识。把人家对的东西当成错的破,把自己错的当对的立,如此为文,自然是一开篇就要遭颠覆。二是每每失之于对同一领域他人研究情况缺乏全面的,甚至是基本的了解,使得文章总在拾人牙慧,包括重蹈覆辙。对同类研究的状况和成果闭目塞听的结果可想而知,这般写作,必然是一张口就要落笑柄。三是往往失之于对自己文章的铺陈叙述不作合理的,甚至是常规的分解,使得文章思路紊乱,结构松
Because of the relationship between work, more articles on history teachers in secondary schools were read on weekdays and more questions were asked about such questions as “How to Write Articles.” To be honest, I am not familiar with writing, but added to see some things others experience, here may wish to say, not necessarily correct. Just say three common diseases. First, the vague and even incorrect understanding often lost to the concept held makes the article untenable from the very beginning. Some papers do not seek solutions, know very little, understand very biasedly, and even make erroneous understandings about the concepts they wish to elaborate or the concepts they have already explained. To treat others as wrong things, wrong ones when they are right, so the text is naturally the first chapter to be subverted. Second, it often lacks the comprehensive and even basic understanding of the research situation of others in the same field, making the article always picking up wisdom, including repeating the same mistakes. It is conceivable that the results of such researches will be closely watched. Such writing must inevitably be a laughing stock. Third, often lost in the presentation of their own articles is not justified, or even conventional decomposition, making the article disorder of mind, loose structure