论文部分内容阅读
作为一种重要的战略战术,军事欺骗经常被广泛应用于武装冲突中,但此种作战方法的使用并非不受限制。不合理的使用欺骗可能构成背信弃义行为而被禁止。由于不同国际条约对此问题的规定存在差异,造成俘获敌人结果的背信行为是否构成国际人道法上的背信弃义行为这一问题至今并无统一的答案。从国际人道法原则、立法目的、背信俘敌行为的危害后果以及人权保障等方面考虑,将俘获敌人纳入背信弃义行为的结果条件范围内,对细化和巩固武装冲突规则体系的意义重大。
As an important strategic tactic, military deception is often used in armed conflicts, but the use of such methods of warfare is not unlimited. Unjustified use of deception may constitute a perfidy behavior was banned. There are no uniform answers to the question of whether there is any difference between the provisions of different international treaties on this issue and whether the act of trust in capturing the enemy’s result constitutes a perfidy in international humanitarian law so far. From the aspects of the principles of international humanitarian law, legislative purposes, the consequences of crimes against backs and trusted enemies, and the protection of human rights, the capture of the enemy within the conditions of the result of perfidy behavior is of great significance to refine and consolidate the system of armed conflicts rules.