论文部分内容阅读
在刑法典中统一规定金融犯罪是妥当的。对于金融犯罪常见的采用列举的方式进行规定为叙明罪状,难免有疏漏之处。金融犯罪的法定刑幅度全部采用相对法定刑,符合罪刑法定和罪刑相适应的要求,但也存在一些问题。金融犯罪中的单位犯罪存在着立法思想混乱的问题。我国金融犯罪的客观方面应多采用混合情节犯以及堵截式规定。有些金融犯罪立法应当明确为目的犯。金融犯罪构成形态的立法设计不宜首选行为犯,而应根据具体犯罪危害的大小、中国社会的容量等因素出发选择行为犯或结果犯。
It is proper to stipulate the financial crime uniformly in the criminal code. It is inevitable that there are omissions for the common use of the enumeration of financial crimes to provide for the clarification of guilt. All the statutory sentences of financial crimes are relatively statutory, which is in line with the legal requirements of crimes and penalties and the appropriate punishment of crimes and punishments, but there are also some problems. The unit crime in financial crimes has the problem of confusion of legislative ideas. The objective aspects of China’s financial crime should be more mixed-use offenses and interdiction-style provisions. Some financial crimes legislation should be clearly committed for the purpose. The legislative design of the constitution of financial crime should not be the preferred act of crime, but should be based on factors such as the size of the specific crime and the capacity of Chinese society.