论文部分内容阅读
影片《蛇案》是在一片侦破、斗智、斗勇宣传声中上映的。谁知兴致勃勃地赶去看了之后,却糊涂起来,不知编导要说明什么?在追求什么? 首先,文不对题。蛇案,顾名思义,蛇与案应息息相关,而且应该是案的发端,这样方能以蛇立案,可影片的故事所展现的是文物馆的兽面鼎等珍贵文物被盗,案件的发端与蛇毫无关系。再说既立为蛇案,蛇就应贯穿于案的始终,侦破从蛇入手,历经与“蛇”搏斗,最后以蛇结案,从中表现出我公安战士的智和勇,方为切题。影片是直到破案的中途才突然出现了蛇。当然,此时立案为蛇只要抓住蛇的来龙去脉生发开去,也无不可。然而,那条口吐红芯,令人毛骨悚然的眼镜蛇就此一闪便无踪无影了,编导放弃了大有文
The film “Snake Case” is released in the sound of a cracked, brutal and courageous propaganda film. Who knows happily rushed to see, but confused, I do not know the director to explain what? In the pursuit of what? First, the text is not right. Snake case, as the name suggests, the snake and the case should be closely related, and should be the origin of the case, so as to snake case, the story of the film shows the museum’s animal husbandry tripod and other precious cultural relics stolen, the origin of the case and the snake No relationship. Besides saying that the snake case should be established, the snake should run through the case from beginning to end. After snatching it from the snake, after wrestling with the “snake,” finally ending it with a snake, showing the wisdom and courage of my public security warrior. The film did not appear suddenly until midway. Of course, at this time as the serpent as long as the snake catch the origin of germinal go, but also no exception. However, that piece of spit red core, the creepy cobra this disappeared without a trace, the director gave up a lot of text