论文部分内容阅读
目的研究并对比产科急症剖宫产与择期剖宫产的临床特征。方法选取62例急症剖宫产产妇作为对照组,另选取同期62例择期剖宫产产妇作为观察组。对比两组产妇的手术指征、手术情况及术后并发症发生率。结果对照组产妇手术指征发生率为87.10%,观察组为33.87%,比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组手术时间、术中出血量及宫腔感染、发热、切口感染发生率均明显高于观察组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论急症剖宫产手术的危险性和风险性高于择期剖宫产手术,严格掌握急症剖宫产及择期剖宫产指征,力求将手术过程中的风险性和危险性降到最低。
Objective To study and compare the clinical features of emergency cesarean section and elective cesarean section. Methods 62 cases of acute cesarean section were selected as the control group. Another 62 cases of elective cesarean section at the same period were selected as the observation group. The two groups of maternal surgical indications, surgical conditions and postoperative complications. Results The incidence of maternal surgical indications was 87.10% in the control group and 33.87% in the observation group. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and intrauterine infection, fever, incision infection incidence were significantly higher in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions The risk and risk of emergency cesarean section surgeries are higher than those of elective cesarean section. The emergency cesarean section and elective cesarean section indications are strictly controlled so as to minimize the risk and risk during operation.