论文部分内容阅读
在解释论上,诉前停止侵犯知识产权的裁定经当事人申请后由作出裁定的审判机构执行,被申请人拒不履行的,适用妨害民事诉讼的强制措施。但是,从立法论的角度,此种裁定应当直接交付执行机构执行,既无需当事人申请,也不宜由审判机构执行。此种裁定的执行以行为为标的,妨害民事诉讼的强制措施并不能解决司法实践中存在的对行为义务的“执行难”问题。从制度上解决此问题的关键在于对间接执行方式的承认。
In interpretative theory, the ruling on suspending the infringement of intellectual property rights before the lawsuit is executed by the adjudication body of the arbitration court upon the application of the party concerned, and the respondent refuses to perform the law, the coercive measures that hinder the civil lawsuit shall be applied. However, judging from the legislative point of view, such ruling should be delivered directly to the implementing agencies for execution, neither by the parties nor by the judicial bodies. The enforcement of such ruling takes the act as the criterion, and the obstruction of the compulsory measure of the civil lawsuit can not solve the “difficult implementation” of the obligation of conduct existed in judicial practice. The key to resolving this issue systematically lies in recognition of the indirect mode of implementation.