侵权法上的安全保障义务与合同义务的交错与厘定——由一起案例引发的思考

• 作 者: 赵秀清
• 机 构: 南开大学经济学院,
• 出 处: 法制与经济(下半月)
• 发表日期: 2007年02期
• 关键词: 安全保障义务 合同责任 房地产公司 违约责任 理论剖析 补充责任 侵权责任 法上 合同法 损害赔偿请求权

本文以案例为线索,在对安全保障义务进行理论剖析的基础上分析了安全保障义务与合同义务的交错与厘定。在理论上,我们能清晰地把作为侵权法中的安全保障义务与合同法中的合同义务加以区分。在现实中,安全保障义务的确还游移于合同责任与侵权责任之间,但从其定位出发,将安全保障义务纳入侵权责任更合理。

Based on the case study, this paper analyzes the security service obligations and the contractual obligations on the basis of the theoretical analysis of the security guarantee obligations. In theory, we can clearly distinguish between the obligation of safety and security in tort law and the contractual obligation in contract law. In reality, the obligation of security assurance does indeed shift between contract liability and tort liability. However, starting from its position, it is more reasonable to include the obligation of security guarantee in the tort liability.